Search for: "Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm
Cooper B-Line, Inc., slip op., No. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
Schulte, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2011 WL 4538450 (N.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:52 am
In Cuevas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:51 am
It’s always satisfying to find an open-minded judge who is willing to change his decision when he is shown to be wrong, but Judge Greisbach of the Eastern District of Wisconsin may be crossing the line from open-mindedness into a chronic inability to make up his mind. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm
Marshfield also filed a complaint against Stuart in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, seeking an order from the court for arbitration as well an injunction barring Stuart from working at TruStile Doors. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
The Bottom Line: In Machne Menachem, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm
Power Ventures and United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:54 am
Among other things, the PTO cites in its denial the Federal Circuit’s decision in Arnold P'ship v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
At least there’s a silver lining, since the case has once again been tossed, this time on compensable loss grounds. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In Han v Australian Kung Fu (Wu Shu) Federation Inc [2011] VSC 498) the plaintiff was partially successful in an application to extend time. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
National Football League, Inc., 11-05209, USDC, Eastern Dist. of Penn.) [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 5:49 am
As always, courts will assess a wide range of fact specific hardship questions as well. -- Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 5/31/11Cite: Colorcon, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
" This dictum about public "persua[sive]" speech later became the basis for the indictment -- which the district court refused to dismiss on First Amendment grounds -- in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
March 28, 1997) (reaffirming PTO 12 in light of Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
In United States v. [read post]
