Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 121 - 140 of 17,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  Also, in a niche field, it is sometime inevitable that the expert will guess or have a strong hunch of the subject of the patent given the date on which they are asked to opine on the CGK. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Plaintiffs say that the law specifically targets them, imposing severe restrictions by forcing the divestment of their U.S. businesses and barring them from operating in their chosen fields, akin to punitive measures historically associated with bills of attainder. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Petitioners say that the law specifically targets them, imposing severe restrictions by forcing the divestment of their U.S. businesses and barring them from operating in their chosen fields, akin to punitive measures historically associated with bills of attainder. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The “extraordinary ability” immigrant (EB-1A) and nonimmigrant (O-1) visas both require showing extraordinary ability in a specific field whether it’s the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Pozen is a brilliant scholar of constitutional law and constitutional theory; he’s written more field-defining pieces in his time as a law professor than most of us could hope for in a lifetime. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The tribunal also found it significant that “there was no consideration given to the applicant’s career circumstances in the process culminating in her termination, specifically that she was close to retirement or might have difficulty finding another job given her age and specialized field … these factors made it more imperative to discuss the noted options with the applicant, rather than simply terminating her”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The tribunal also found it significant that “there was no consideration given to the applicant’s career circumstances in the process culminating in her termination, specifically that she was close to retirement or might have difficulty finding another job given her age and specialized field … these factors made it more imperative to discuss the noted options with the applicant, rather than simply terminating her”. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
As the subject of ownership and provenance are paramount to the Center for Art Law’s mission, having dominated court dockets as leading art law disputes, the following is intended as a survey of the most highlighted categories of looted art. [read post]