Search for: "Greene v. Municipal Court" Results 121 - 140 of 271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm by Cardone Law Firm
Since 1997, Cliff has sat as a Judge, Ad Hoc, in Juvenile Court, Traffic Court, as well as Municipal Court in New Orleans. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
”[25]  A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
  This connection bridges law, legislation, government, custom, policy, and process.[1]  And it touches on the connection with law producers and law protectors—for example courts, mediators, etc.[2] We do not approach that issue from the perspective of philosophy, but more practically from an institutional perspective. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:23 am
The appellate court contrasted the facts of the Kish case with that of Levive v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 The court said "[A]; volunteer firefighter must be afforded due process in disciplinary proceedings” where he or she has been subjected to disciplinary action initiated by his or her Fire Company, citing Matter of Greene v Medford Fire Department, 6 AD3d 705. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  The Sustainable Economies Law Center maintains a legal resource library,  Co-opLaw.org in partnership with the Green Collar Communities Clinic (GC3). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 6:56 am
” Citing Koso v Greene, 260 N.Y. 491 and other decisions, the court explained that “nothing in subdivision 1 of §65 of the Civil Service Law that requires that a provisional appointee be fully qualified for permanent appointment or that he [or she] must be eligible to take the civil service test for the position before being provisionally appointed to it. [read post]