Search for: "MARTIN v. JACKSON" Results 121 - 140 of 311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm by Ben Vernia
Martin, 796 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2015), which rejected the application of the “government benefits” provision in such cases; and a Third Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Journalist Martin Hickman has been covering the trial, supported by crowdfunding, on the Byline website. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
The term “power of judicial review” was not used in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The architect Zaha Hadid has settled her case against the New York Review of Books and critic Martin Filler. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
For instance, as still explained by The Hollywood Reporter, during the scene at the funeral of civil rights demonstrator Jimmie Lee Jackson Oyelowo/King gives a rousing oratory, asking the crowd, "Who murdered Jimmie Lee Jackson? [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
From the New York Review of Books: "'Selma' v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The “Sun Six” trial at Kingston Crown Court – we have had regular posts on this Martin Hickman (courtesy of Hacked Off). [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, on Thursday 9 October 2014, there was the judgment of the Court of Appeal (Arden, Jackson and Macfarlane LJJ) in the case of OPO v MLA ([2014] EWCA Civ 1277). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On 31 July 2014, there will be a hearing in the case of Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust & ors v Shaikh Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: PNM v Times Newspapers, heard 18 June 2014 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson and Vos LJJ). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]