Search for: "Monroe v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Photo News and Failed Messiah report on a New York state trial court decision handed down this week in Convers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm by Schachtman
Two particularly perfidious myths perpetrated by the asbestos litigation industry is that crocidolite was not used in the United States, and that chrysotile is as potent in causing mesothelioma as is crocidolite. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
 First, as this is a State Circuit Court Judge, this ruling only applies to Monroe County. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Chambers the United States Supreme Court held that a state's evidentiary rule is trumped by and cannot preclude a defendant form introduce reliable evidence consistent with his right to present a defense. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]