Search for: "Oklahoma v West" Results 121 - 140 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
  Obama gets significantly less votes than Kerry in Arizona (not hard to understand), but also in this weird swath of territory running from southeast Oklahoma, through Arkansas, through Tennessee, through southeastern Kentucky and southwest West Virginia. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:41 pm by Sam Brunson
What happened is this: on April 26, 2018, the Attorney General of Michigan signed onto an amicus brief with the states of Wisconsin, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 am by John McFarland
Many producing states have now adopted the marketable condition rule, including Colorado, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, Alaska, Virginia and perhaps New Mexico. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
The SAG amicus brief opposing Oregon in Klein does not mention that nine of the 11 participating states — Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia — have laws that define public accommodation more broadly than federal law, to include businesses that provide goods or services to the general public. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 The 9 states using the ‘49 percent’ form: Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, North Dakota, Utah and West Virginia. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Rodriguez Was Remanded Back to State Court, West Virginia University v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]