Search for: "PEREZ V. U.S. "
Results 121 - 140
of 736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Instead, I consulted press accounts, Justice Department press statements, research papers, university publications, teen magazines, business publications, the Federal Trade Commission, women’s legal defense advocacy pages, U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:43 am
Take-Two Interactive Software, the company behind ‘Grand Theft Auto V’ (GTA V) has filed several lawsuits in the US and abroad, targeting alleged cheat software. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Dec. 441 (BIA 2018), and the only other court of appeals to reach this issue, see Hernandez-Perez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:22 am
W., Inc., 568 U.S. 597 (2013)Perez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5838, Perez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
Here, by the way, is what Justice Gorsuch said about the matter in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
The U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977). [4] Bannister Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
Perez, in which an administrative law judge within OSHA, as well the U.S. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc., 736 F.3d 722, 732–33 (6th Cir. 2013) (Sutton, J., concurring) (highlighting problems with requiring the rule of lenity to bow to Auer deference); see also Perez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 10:48 am
See, e.g., Perez Bar & Grill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 10:48 am
See, e.g., Perez Bar & Grill v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:12 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:35 pm
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas joined then-Justice Scalia in Perez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Perez is already receiving significant attention. [read post]
