Search for: "People v. Lee (1990)"
Results 121 - 140
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
In response to a devastating report on jailhouse informants issued by the Los Angeles County grand jury in 1990, the county adopted procedures that required the approval of a committee before informants could be used. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am
Dotcom has gone out of his way since the early 1990s to put himself at the center of media attention. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
By Amnesty International’s count, since 2001 over 500 people have died in the US as a result of Taser use. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Specifically, it asked whether two decisions, from 1990 and 2003, which upheld restrictions on corporate speech, should be overturned. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
The notion that corporations did not have the same free-speech rights as human beings had been practically a given of constitutional law for decades, and the 1990 and 2003 decisions (both joined by Stevens) reflected that consensus. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
We all cite the Lee et al study on identifying terms as trademarks by their placement on the package, but what about replicability? [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Relying on State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
Lee (Trump 2019, replacing Stephen Reinhardt), joined by Consuelo M. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Natasha Bertrand, MJ Lee, Alex Marquardt, and Oren Liebermann report for CNN. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Are people frightened of me? [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
rates charged, the necessity of the services, whether they were performed within a reasonable time commensurate with the problem, the trustee’s skill and experience, and whether the amount of compensation is reasonable in comparison with what is charged by comparably skilled people. [read post]
