Search for: "Roberts v. Does, et al" Results 121 - 140 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
Skavdahl, Judge.Representing Appellant Swinney, et al: John H. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:42 am by Steven Cohen
Dackman, et al – Maryland Court of Appeals – October 16th, 2015) involves lead exposure to an eight year old boy living in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2015 ONSC 1177 [1] We have a marvellous legal system in Ontario. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:25 pm
Roberts, Jr., for a 30-day extension of the time to file the city's petition in the case of District of Columbia, et al., v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:57 am by Gene Quinn
Lee, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), related to the petition for writ of certiorari filed by Oil States Energy Services, LLC, Petitioner, against Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et. al. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by Douglas Laycock
Professor Laycock also submitted an amicus brief on behalf of  Christian Legal Society, et al., in support of the non-Government parties. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm by Kevin Miles
The full decision is located here, but the holding is below.http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_8njq.pdf ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY ET AL. v.MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
The new case is El Paso County, et al., v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”The Order vacates a previous appellate victory by TiVo and includes the following text:IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition of Defendants-Appellants EchoStar Corporation et al. for panel rehearing is denied. (2) The petition of Defendants-Appellants EchoStar Corporation, et al. for rehearing en banc is granted. (3) The court’s March 4, 2010 opinion is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am by Josh Blackman
Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. [read post]