Search for: "State v. Cotter" Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am by Florian Mueller
But it is taken into consideration, and a licensing-based business model certainly doesn't weigh in favor of an injunction, which is why "patent trolls" rarely obtain injunctions in U.S. district court at this stage.While we're on the subject of comparative law, I appreciate Professor Thomas Cotter's latest Comparative Patent Remedies blog post, in which he "certainly agree[s] that 'the German statute falls far short of eBay v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
The Crown, as a representative of the state, on the other hand, has no duty to the victim. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
The speech involved in this case was on a matter of public concern, notwithstanding the testimony of Durham attorney Bill Cotter that it sounded like a spat or dispute between two people that might be best settled by the North Carolina State Bar. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
”[5] In a 2016 decision, United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
The few states that recognize medical monitoring as a remedy recognize it as a cause of action, like Pennsylvania, Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
Cotter, 22 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
K 3242 C676 2011 Class act : an international legal perspective on class discrimination Anne-Marie Mooney Cotter. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter discusses the court’s recent decision in Republican National Committee v. [read post]