Search for: "Tate, Appeal of" Results 121 - 140 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The “[S]tate may regulate abortion before viability as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Retirement and Social Security Law §600 (a) (2) (a) provides that "[m]embers in the uniformed personnel in institutions under the jurisdiction of the [D]epartment of [C]orrections and [C]ommunity [S]upervision of New York [S]tate" are excluded from Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15 benefits. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Board appealed Supreme Court’s ruling, contending that arbitration of the subject matter of the dispute is barred by Education Law §3602-e and public policy. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:26 am by Russ Bensing
  A court of appeals has jurisdiction only over final appealable orders, and a void sentence doesn’t create one, so does that mean the original appeal was a nullity, and has no res judicata effect? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
The trial judge “halted the proceedings to warn Tates that forging documents and practicing law without a license were both crimes and to inform Tates of her Fifth Amendment privileges. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:26 pm
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal by the FCC of the "fleeting expletives" case, where the Second Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the FCC actions fining stations for isolated incidents where a profanity was uttered on the air in a live program. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
Well, the court of appeals said the judge couldn't do that. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:36 am
There may be a further case, Bernstein v Tate, on s.21 possessions soon. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It's usually the Court of Appeals which issues a game changing decision, which sets stare decisis on its ear. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Et Al., No. 07-582 (S.Ct) Reply Brief for Petitioners Statements by Commissioners Copps and Tate. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am by Matrix Law
The Court will determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to hold that the claimants were entitled to a remedy in the tort of private nuisance by reason of the Tate Modern’s use of the top floor of its Blavatnik Building as a viewing platform. [read post]