Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
The European Commission’s guidance on the Directive’s transposition and implementation states that family membership in the direct line “extends to adoptive relationships” and calls on member states to secure children’s best interests in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am
(citing Union Supply Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
While there are some distinctions, Lou, a leading constitutional authority on national security law and separation of powers, found a case as early as 1912, Firth Sterling Steel Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
In its commentary, SBA states that it is clarifying that (1) when a CO requests recertification of size with respect to an order or agreement, the FSS exception does not apply, and (2) if there is a disqualifying size recertification in response to any event in 125.12 (including a merger, sale, or acquisition), the concern must notify the CO for the underlying contract, notify the CO for each existing order, and update its SAM.gov profile to reflect its… [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States—was its last full opinion of the October 2023 Term. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
We recently reported (see our earlier blog article) the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in BLR Group of America, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States could be good news. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm
What is consistent with this long line of authority is the underlying question of whether the terms and conditions have been specifically drawn to the attention of the seller. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Here is Kim’s guest post: This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
The indictment charged them with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Novoa, supra), including impeachment material (United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
For this post we consider the first part of section II of the materials: II.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:24 am
(collectively, “Illumina”) appeal from a decision of the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of California that claims 1–2, 4–5, and 9–10 of U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
