Search for: "DOES 1-100" Results 1381 - 1400 of 14,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 6:21 pm by FHH Law
 On July 23, 2013, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 13-100. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:48 pm
All the letter does is briefly review her immigration history - which as I said, sounds plausible - and refutes some of the media questions. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 1:45 pm
From my read of today's oral argument transcript, it appears that Philip Morris is arguing that if its course of conduct injured 100 different Oregonians and if the maximum amount of punitive damages that Philip Morris could be required to pay as a result of that course of conduct was $100 million, then the most in punitive damages that any single plaintiff could receive was $1 million. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Plaintiffs argued that the survey compared two versions of the same page—which is true; the survey does effectively test whether the disclaimer does any work to change the meaning consumers take away from the pie charts/diminish the message that the procedure is medicallyeffective. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by Jeff Gamso
She could do jail time, or pay $100 restitution and walk 30 miles. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:57 am
The mark is a take-off the word “googol”, which means a number that is equal to 1 followed by 100 zeros. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:10 pm by Florian Mueller
Theoretically, any change to the legal framework could even help parties avoid 100% of all litigation. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:24 am
  Does anyone think the Pai-led FCC objectively considered the facts and reached positions 100% opposite what the Wheeler-led FCC identified? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:00 am by Moderator
If the SOL phase has ended, it does not necessarily mean a lawsuit can’t or won’t be filed; it does, however, provide an easy path for dismissal of the suit. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
Talking of character and quality, the IP Draughts weblog is making the most of its inclusion in the American Bar Association's Blawg 100: if you value well-informed pedantry as much as this Kat does, be sure to give it your unswerving, unconditional support. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:24 am
  Does anyone think the Pai-led FCC objectively considered the facts and reached positions 100% opposite what the Wheeler-led FCC identified? [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Her concurrence is worth reading at length, because she's exactly, 100% correct. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:49 am
 It is not new (it came out in December 2014), but what is new is the excellent and detailed report of the decision in English (the original decision is in German) in the latest EPI Information (you can download it at the link here; the article starts on page 100) by Dr Eva Ehlich, a patent attorney at Maiwald.I WILL be heard! [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
It is a lengthy decision (almost 100 paragraphs) covering a wide range of vexing issues relating to the private copying exception, with the CJEU handing down eight rulings in response to the six lengthy questionsreferred to it [For an overview of the CJEU preliminary reference procedure, see previous Katpost here]. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am by Nico Cordes
The limiting feature could not be maintained in the patent in view of Article 100(c) EPC, nor could it be removed from the claims without violating Article 123(3) EPC. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:57 am by Colby Pastre
Income tax after credits (the measure of “income taxes paid” above) does not account for the refundable portion of EITC. [read post]