Search for: "In re Connor" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am by MBettman
In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-1027 (It is not a due process violation to impose upon juvenile registration and notification requirements that extend beyond the age of 18 or 21.) [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
True, I had clerked at the Supreme Court for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, and he hadn’t earned that honor, but I was an untested woman arguing against the received wisdom of the law professors. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Your then-Chairman Steve O’Connor had lots of questions about bringing central clearing, dealer registration, trading platform regulation, and greater transparency to the swaps markets.[5] After all we achieved to reform the swaps markets, Scott O’Malia—your CEO and a former fellow CFTC Commissioner—has asked me to return for yet another lively Chicago discussion, this time about our work in the $24 trillion Treasury markets. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
For many years, Sandra Day O’Connor chose to open the questioning in most cases, and thus show the lawyers—and her colleagues—which way she, as the Court’s swing vote, was leaning. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
For many years, Sandra Day O’Connor chose to open the questioning in most cases, and thus show the lawyers—and her colleagues—which way she, as the Court’s swing vote, was leaning. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Pix credit HEREEthics has always been a term that is easy to pronounce, easier to segregate and narrow, and nearly impossible to produce easy answers. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on James E. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
O'Connor's Pub)FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 20198:30 AM – 10:00 AMPetitioning the President: James Madison, The Haitian Revolution, and a Resurgence of the International Slave Trade (Arlington Room)Chairs: Malick Ghachem, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (mghachem@mit.edu), Rebecca J Scott, University of Michigan (rjscott@umich.edu) and Darrell Meadows, Nation Historical Publications & Records… [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Adjudicators can find, through no fault of their own, that their adjudication career is over. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The strong presumption in favour of open court proceedings (and therefore against anonymity of litigation participants) has recently been re-emphasized by the Supreme Court in A.B. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Second, on February 2, 2009, the Ohio AG announced that Gen Re had agreed to a $72 million settlement. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
The lineup reminds me of a time when Justice Sandra Day O’Connor announced a similarly complex listing and quipped that there appeared to be “more opinions that there are justices. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Fifth Circuit order in In re Mesaros, decided by Judges Edith Brown Clement, Kurt Engelhardt, and Andrew Oldham: Respondents allege that on October 30, 2020, they were travelling through Texas in a Biden-Harris tour bus. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On 17 November 2021 Judge Schammer handed down judgment in the case of Turtur AO v Connor [2021] SADC 127 damages of Aus$30,000 were awarded in respect of Facebook posts. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Connor said that a Fourth Amendment “excessive force” claim should be objectively evaluated “at the moment” of the application of force. [read post]