Search for: "Mitchell v. State"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 1:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
In Tinnus v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
No. 1560, has indicated that it is not necessary, in Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:27 pm
Because in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 2:24 am
First, the question came up in the context of a competency issue from a state court proceeding in Filiaggi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
Id. at * 13 (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
See Pye v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
Mitchell which, among other things, held that Congress could not regulate the voting age in state elections. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:13 am
Pittenger and Wolman v Walters.These two cases held that the only educational equipment and materials that states could provide to children in religious schools were secular textbooks. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
This right is of the highest importance, especially when the defendant has ventured to criticise the government of the day, or those who hold authority or power in the state. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Pettitt v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
State of Florida, 817 So.2d 799 (Fla.2002); and State of Florida v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
Canada The Times Colonist reports that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused permission to appeal in the case of Nazerali v Mitchell in which the judge had awarded damages of $1,2 million (2016 BCSC 810) thus bringing to an end a 7 year legal battle. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
(The Court hasn't yet considered any cases in which O'Connor precedents such as Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
Sharon Mitchell. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:14 am
The case, Garland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
It is also likely that blood can be drawn when the juvenile is unconscious and suspected of DWI under the exigency standard established by the Supreme Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:34 am
(Doyle v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The Scots Law News and Jonathan Mitchell QC have already covered the issue at length, both links well worth a visit.In the meanwhile, here follows the ruling from the European Court of Human Rights … and lets hope in the light of Lord Penrose’ review of Court of Session business, which resulted in the recently enacted Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No. 2) (Causes in the Inner House) 2010, SSI 2010/30 (pdf) may clear some of these inequalities up, if… [read post]
