Search for: "In Re Investigation of Circuit Judge" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the symposium edition of the Notre Dame Law Review, Jon D. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:53 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Typically that means--and in the two cases that were consolidated in Martinez Ramirez it meant--demonstrating what a competent pre-trial or pre-sentencing investigation would have yielded. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 12:54 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Circuit, asking whether Judge Griffith is the all-important swing vote. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals had largely upheld a lower court ruling restricting Trump’s speech in the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:43 am
Circuit Court of Appeals found that the condition imposed by Eastern District Judge Nicholas Garaufis on the post-release supervision of Lamont Reeves was "unduly vague and not reasonably related to the goals of sentencing. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
because the Border Patrol investigation was not an "official proceeding" within the meaning of the tampering statute. . [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
Cindy: We're working our way to forgiving Marta about that. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Robin E. Shea
The doctor says, 'You're crazy.' The man says, 'I want a second opinion.' The doctor says, 'OK, you're ugly, too.'" "Take my federal agencies -- please! [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:24 am
" Circuit Judge David Dugan granted Dillon's request for bond on Tuesday morning, setting it at $100,000 -- or $25,000 in cash. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Katz Interactive Call Process- ing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1319 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit 2012). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(That’s just not true, though—it immediately conveys that the providers won’t judge you—it just doesn’t say what they won’t judge you for, which is the QUICK issue.) [read post]