Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 22,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 2:36 am
The Commission also noted that the number of blackouts actually occurring as a result of the rules has greatly diminished; as a practical matter, teams generally don’t have trouble selling out their stadiums. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:17 am
They can only have sway if they are adopted into a specific jurisdiction as a relevant ethics rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
Though again not adopting a categorical rule, the Court made clear that “[s]tatements by very young children will rarely, if ever, implicate the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:49 am
In this particular matter, the appellant RS was married to the first respondent, JPS from 1991 until the dissolution of their marriage in May 2019. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Supreme Court annulled the Department's action and remanded the matter to the Department "for consideration of a lesser penalty. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:21 am
It says this ruling, Marsh v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The other league does not go along for almost 50 years but then decides to adopt the rule as well. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:29 am
Former Rule 136, which was applicable only to domestic matters has been subsumed by the newer Part 137 which, with limited exceptions that are not alleged here, is applicable to all civil matters. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
Therefore, the cruise line industry has adopted a rule that requires a complete planning of every ship's route from departure to arrival. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
So the Supremes adopted this new police-created emergency doctrine (so we can dispense with the quotation marks). [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 11:47 am
American presidents, therefore, adopted illegal practices but in such a way that allowed plausible deniability. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
In an en banc ruling today in US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:27 am
It needs to take the next step forward, including adopting rules, to allow full plenary hearings, including actual testimony to proceed, as we enter the new virtual reality of workers’ compensation.Relating information:The Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, [CPRSAA] 2020 (March 6, 2020)Is the workers' compensation system ready for the 2019-nCoV [coronavirus] virus? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Recent Proxy and Annual Report Developments INSIDER TRADING DISCLOSURES Environmental and Social Matters Additional Annual Report and Proxy Statement Matters In December 2022, the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Recent Proxy and Annual Report Developments INSIDER TRADING DISCLOSURES Environmental and Social Matters Additional Annual Report and Proxy Statement Matters In December 2022, the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:52 am
The district court decision, which was adopted and upheld by the high court on appeal, found that the defendant did have a duty of reasonable care to protect the plaintiff from reasonably foreseeable harm caused by third parties. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Rules too! [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
The proposed rule published June 29, 2012, solicited comments on two options for a 24-hour PM2.5 standard to improve visibility that were not adopted in the final rule. [read post]
