Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Defendant also cited California’s Brown Act which states that “public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
~Thomas Jefferson, 1789 To underscore these points, the Framers provided in Article V, not just one but two methods (and four paths) for amendment. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 10:02 am
The judgment of the High Court in National Crime Agency v Mrs A [2018] EWHC 2534 3 is the first public example of enforcers’ application for, and judicial examination of, a UWO. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am
The court takes another shot in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 4:50 am
Daniel v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:26 pm
” As exemplars of cases requiring independence, he cited school-desegregation case Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 12:18 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
Judge Janice Brown, never one to mince words, dissents. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm
Carlsen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
The blacklisting of RTSA is intended to increase pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s regime and prevent his “repression of the Venezuelan people“. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:04 am
” People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
Making the judges rely on fees raised from people being sentenced to pay a large part of court operating expenses would put their objectivity at risk, they said. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 7:17 am
by James Toomey On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
