Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1441 - 1460 of 7,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 6:58 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
This past week, the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States District Court in the case of Sun Life Assurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
When asked by respondent’s counsel why she did not want to return to Mexico, Z.M.F.Z. stated that she wished to remain in the Las Vegas because of her school, her friends, and to learn English. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:57 am by Ted Frank
Sean Wajert tells us of a remarkable failure-to-warn case, Steven Morris v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm by Mark Ashton
The implications can be said to be national in scope as individual states step forward with their own interpretations of  Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Aug. 7, 1990); In re English Seafood (USA) Inc., 743 F.Supp. 281, 286-89 (D.Del.1990) (holding that the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claim for corporate dissolution, but that the court should abstain from exercising it); Codos v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Court of Appeals says that ESL instructors for a private educational entity are not entitled to overtime.The case is Fernandez v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:32 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Veerasingam v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
Especially, I might think, for non-English speakers, or someone hearing the phrase for the first time. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, the judge stated that the “uncertain state of the law” meant that his conclusion on this point could only be provisional ([132]) until the CJEU gives guidance in Sky v SkyKick on what circumstances may constitute bad faith. [read post]