Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
After a lengthy interlude, along comes Magid v Magid, 2017 NY Slip Op 32603(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 14, 2017]. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
  The WPR Letter’s Listed Countries and Regions Below we list the countries where, according to the WPR letter, “the United States has deployed United States combat-equipped forces to conduct counterterrorism operations and to advise, assist, and accompany security forces of select foreign partners on counterterrorism operations. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States (consolidated with two other cases), which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In its brief, United Policyholders stated that the D&O insurer’s “interpretation of the subject exclusion renders paid-for coverage illusory. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental contract. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
(Rabbi) Daniel Thau Teitelbaum has the distinction of having been excluded in case that went to the United States Supreme Court (Joiner), but Shira Kramer,3 Richard Clapp, and Peter F. [read post]