Search for: "Sample v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 2:52 am
 Specifically, on December 4, the ECHR issued its decision, S. and Marper v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am by Brian A. Comer
You can find his post here.In a nutshell, the decision seems to show a greater reliance on the punitive damages standards set forth in the United States Supreme Court decision of BMW of North America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
The Missouri Court of Appeals rejected this specificc challenge in part because Egilman had explained that: “whether the 1972 NIOSH study identified fibers specifically as ‘asbestos’ was inconsequential, as the only other possible fiber that could be present in a talc sample is a ‘talc fiber, which is chemically identical to anthophyllite asbestos and structurally the same’. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by John Pfaff
Adam Liptak has a depressing piece up in today's New York Times about how states are respodning to the Supreme Court's decision in Graham v Florida, which declared life without parole sentences for minors unconstitutional. [read post]