Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Richard Goldfarb
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am by Marissa Miller
Holder, and the two same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Finally, our state was famous for something unrelated to policy choices! [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
 However, it is often the procedural strategy that can tie your brain into knots. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
  In his lecture, Judge Calibresi stated that he knew that Bickel’s brain cancer was caused by his smoking, and went on to muse whether banning smoking would have saved his friend’s life. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
It is therefore insufficient: see Novartis AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1039, [2011] ECC 10 at [77]. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:48 am by Broc Romanek
Arguably inconsistent with this analysis, however, they state that BNVs "will not affect the outcome" of the vote. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]