Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Campaign Finance California: “Californians Appointed to State Posts Could Soon Be Barred from Writing Checks to Lawmakers Who Vote on Their Nomination” by Patrick McGreevy for Los Angeles Times Nevada: “Lack of Transparency Questioned in Campaign Theft by DA’s Aide” by Jeff German and David Ferrara for Las Vegas Review-Journal Ohio: “Ohio’s Campaign-Finance Laws for Judges Debated at Sixth Circuit” by Kevin Koeninger for… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:03 am
In that situation, the law will likely bar you forever from getting compensation for your losses. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Ultimately, court-watchers came away with no clear sense of how the California Supreme Court might rule. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:21 pm
But -- at least currently -- double jeopardy doesn't bar California (or other states) from charging them with state crimes as well.Many of the existing defendants have recently been charged with additional counts of money laundering -- an offense that carries substantially additional jail time. [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:37 pm
Kuhl (State) Los Angeles Superior Court, Central Civil West Hon. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
The court modified the State Bar’s proposal by adding additional provisions and comments to the proposed rule, including: Adding the courts as an additional avenue to report misconduct. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm
App. 4th 1427 (2010), a panel of the the California Court of Appeal expressly applied the filed rate doctrine to bar a consumer protection claim based on an insurance companies act of charging allegedly excessive insurance premiums. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
California-based Delaware corporations have successfully challenged the enforceability of CGCL Section 2115 in court. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
[reaffirming the view of Justice Thomas that the FAA does not apply to state court proceedings]), nor whether we would adopt a similar rule as a matter of state law. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:08 am
” “Instead of approving the petition, the state supreme court tightened the confidentiality rule, saying in its order, ‘We decline to amend the rule as proposed by the Bar. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:28 am
Stated income (no-doc) mortgages, of course. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
(This is unlike ISL, which, as pointed out above, sought to impose distinctive limitations on state courts with respect to federal elections.)And that (barring a state court ruling from applying in both state and federal elections) is a high bar for a federal court to meet; federal courts aren’t lightly going to tell state courts that the state-court interpretations of… [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
On remand, the district court should limit the scope of the injunction to regulate conduct occurring within California. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:42 am
For California agencies, unlike Washington, this is the only way to seek court review before disclosure because the agencies themselves are barred from filing lawsuits asking for guidance. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
The state petitioner raised Blakely issues before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:35 am
Three months ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm
Cos., the California Supreme Court held that the Unfair Insurance Practices Act, which does not expressly preclude a private right of action, bars claims based on alleged violations of that statute because the California Legislature contemplated only administrative enforcement by the Insurance Commissioner. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm
Cos., the California Supreme Court held that the Unfair Insurance Practices Act, which does not expressly preclude a private right of action, bars claims based on alleged violations of that statute because the California Legislature contemplated only administrative enforcement by the Insurance Commissioner. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
In a pro-business decision, the Los Angeles Superior Court Appellate Division recently established state standards for damages and standing for California public accessibility cases in Mundy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
SCIL recently received accreditation by the Committee of Bar Examiners for the State of California, allowing its students to sit for Bar Examination upon graduation. [read post]
