Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
GuestKat Rosie Burbidge discusses Bhayani & Anor v Taylor Bracewell LLP, [2016] EWHC 3360, a summary judgment in which addressed the question of whether there was passing off due to the use of the plaintiff’s family name as part of the law firm’s name after she had left the partnership.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 130 [week ending on Sunday 8 January] | Around the IP Blogs | Sunday Surprises | Trademark and co-branding as a badge of … did you… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
The letter instructed PE “not to report for any further shifts” and stated that his “termination would be effective as of September 23.... [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
This case is the direct result of the Court's 1992 opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
In 1988, a Missouri state court convicted Weaver of killing Charles Taylor and sentenced him to death. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
In 2005, Mary Taylor-Christensen struck and killed a fellow motorist. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 409, 120 S. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Roper, and Taylor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
" Taylor v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:28 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Work related investigationsCerrone v Cahill, USDC, NDNY, 84 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
"After taking the foregoing considerations into account, GOER concluded that Cushing was not required to perform out-of-title work.As judicial review of GOER's determination in this context is limited to whether it is arbitrary, capricious or without any rational, the court concluded that in "the absence of compelling evidence establishing that [Cushing] performed distinctive aspects of the NA1 job title that differentiated it from the N2 job title," there was no basis for… [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
[Shapiro @ Cato; Bond v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
”*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time as… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm
In Grimm v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm
In Grimm v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2014); United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
