Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
* Taylor Law contract provisions, however, may not adversely affect the layoff rights vested in employees by law. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
Per Sweets v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
Berkeley School of Law, everyone can now find some of the amicus briefs filed today in Baze v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
In Thurman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:16 am
Taylor, 2009 Ohio 5822, 2009 Ohio App. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
Taylor, 375 Ill. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:21 pm
Nijhawan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
The application of Taylor and Navarro-Lopez in the immigration context may remain controversial (see the cert. grant in Nijhawan v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
In Dohmen v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
In 77 Charters, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Louisiana (on the constitutionality of the death penalty for child rape) No. 07-371, Taylor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:51 pm
The first, Taylor v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
YIGZAW V. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 3:03 am
Contrary to Drexel’s contention, the plaintiff’s claim that Drexel overbilled and charged him for unnecessary legal services is distinct from a legal malpractice cause of action, as the plaintiff’s claim does not challenge the quality of Drexel’s work (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d at 416; Tanenbaum v Molinoff, 118 AD3d 774, 775-776). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 2:29 pm
In two prior cases, Taylor v. [read post]