Search for: "V D"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 76,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2008, 9:52 am
R v Chargot (trading as Contract Services) and others [2008] UKHL 73; [2008] WLR (D) 379 “When criminal proceedings were brought against an employer under ss 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state [...] [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:55 am
Mohammadi v Shellpoint Trustees Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 1098 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 169 “When a legally assisted person's solicitors had ceased to act, without another firm being retained under a legal aid certificate, and that fact had been communicated to the opposing party, then from the moment of that communication the litigant ceased to [...] [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:15 am
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 354 "The words 'that person' in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 referred to a notional non-connected counterparty operating in the appropriate market at the appropriate time. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:10 am
Read the […] The post MICHELLE QUARLES v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(Veera v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban); HM Advocate v M; HM Advocate v G [2011] UKSC 43; [2011] WLR (D) 288 “In principle the line as to when access to legal advice had to be provided before a person suspected of a criminal offence was questioned by police should be drawn as from the moment when he had been taken into police custody, or his freedom of action had been significantly curtailed.” WLR Daily, 6th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Le brevet avait pour objet un produit pharmaceutique vétérinaire mou à mâcher comprenant du pamoate de sodium, un ou plusieurs principes actifs pharmaceutiques ainsi que d'autres ingrédients. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
In Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 7:39 am
Here's the abstract: La « vérité » peut-elle faire l’objet d’un droit ? [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:43 am
Huttopia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
In Burkhart v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:28 pm
District Court Judge Dean D. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
LEXIS 64860 (D. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:10 am
CHRISTOPHER D. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
The Sedlik v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b) [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
The suit (Paul Lis DJ Paulie Broadcasting LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
In Cubist v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 7:21 am
Unlike in the U.S.A., European and Swiss D&O policies do not exclude internal liability cases (“I v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11010, subd. 2(D)-(F)), to the issues in this case. [read post]
