Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 37,519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Prince, Penn State Dickinson Law ERISA plan fiduciaries must be permitted to consider ESG factors when selecting plan investments. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am
ECOWASThe Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
OPM OIG’s Suspension Authorities: Separate and apart from its mandatory and permissive authorities, OPM OIG’s Administrative Sanctions Group is also responsible for imposing suspension actions against health care providers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Here's another hurdle to jump, although it's certainly jumpable.Hawes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:27 am
The case, Ugochukwu Goodluck Nwauzor, et al v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In its election materials, the GGC also stated that its candidates expressed “support [for] establishing an LSO working group to determine whether it needs electoral reform to prevent the running of slates in Bencher elections. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm
Deski: This case concerns several Texas abortion advocacy groups that seek to fund or support abortion for Texans in states where it remains legal…. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:14 pm
From today's report and recommendation in Koppel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:27 am
Lenz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
This case came out of a series of inverse condemnation cases filed in Texas by a group of local landowners alleging a state highway project had caused widespread flooding and deprived them of the economic value of their property. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
It did so largely on the basis of its interpretation of Article 9(1) of Directive 89/104, the key wording of which is "has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a later trade mark registered in that Member State while being aware of such use". [read post]
