Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
Once it's out there, it’s out there forever and for basically anyone to see. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:00 am
It was further indicated that the Plaintiff’s previously stipulated that the Co-Defendant hematologist was not an actual or ostensible agent for whom the hospital could be found vicariously liable. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:07 am
The legal standard the Court devises draws from the FLSA's "economic reality" test, which determines whether the defendant had the power to hire and fire, supervised and controlled employees, determined salaries and maintained employment records.Under this test, Garrioch was an "employer" under the FMLA because she played a substantial role in plaintiff's termination, even if that decision formally rested with someone else. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:42 am
The City of New York rejected their requests for it to defend them in the civil lawsuits. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:07 am
Camille Clark, Trustee of Pleasant Township, a 6-page, 5-0 opinion by Justice Dickson in a case argued May 22, 2008 - "The deputy trustee's injurious acts did not fall within the scope of his employment for the defendant Trustee, and thus the Trustee is not vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
The judgment was entered in 2003 and did not find defendant and her husband jointly and severally liable. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:24 am
” Under the plaintiff’s reading of the rule, the defendants could be held liable even if they had never made any statements to him, the panel said. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Generally, corporate officers and directors are not personally liable for the corporation’s actions, as corporations are considered distinct legal entities separate from their officers, shareholders, and directors. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Defendant Allowed to Reopen Case After Filing Response Seven Months Late, Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog, September 16, 2016. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
The panel noted that the jury was instructed to determine whether each defendant violated Barrington’s trademark, to list the amount of damages, and to determine whether the infringement was willful. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:42 am
The prosecution must prove defendant’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 11:08 am
’s daily revenue. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:18 pm
CAFA Bloggers from McGlinchey Stafford’s Cleveland Office (James S. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:30 am
The law is clear that employees and supervisors are not individually liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
Timeliness can spell the difference between the defendant being liable and non-liable — but it is not an absolute concept. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
The answer is that the defendant accepted that art.12 added nothing to the defence to the infringement claim, namely that "the defendant's use of the signs was not liable to affect the functions of the Trade Marks. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 2:18 pm
s copyright infringement claim against defendant Family Dollar Stores Inc. and another. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
We then granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the issue of whether the Appellate Court properly reversed the trial court's decision to grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Based upon this ruling, the trial court dismissed the Plaintiff’s negligence claims against the employer.According to the Superior Court's Opinion, the Pennsylvania was injured in a motor vehicle accident when the vehicle operated by the Defendant driver struck the Plaintiff’s motorcycle.The Defendant driver was an employee of Dairy Farmers of America. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:14 am
In the subject case, the defendant medical facility sought summary judgment, arguing that it could not be held vicariously liable for the defendant surgeon’s actions, asserting he was an independent contractor, and emphasizing that none of its employees committed any independent acts of negligence. [read post]
