Search for: "People v Edwards"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm
The court denied that request, revoked the sentence of probation, and imposed the aforementioned determinate term of imprisonment and period of postrelease supervision on the ground that defendant failed to comply with the community service requirement.Citing its authority to "substitute our own discretion for that of a trial court [that] has not abused its discretion in the imposition of a sentence" (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 86; see People v… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
” Moreover, if, as Edward Glaeser and Joshua Gottleib have argued, urban fortunes began to revive in the 1990s because more people developed a preference for urban life, then urban policies designed to suppress disorder and crime by suppressing commercial activity are arguably counterproductive. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
Edward A. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Since that post, we’ve been deluged with additional articles….Well, not exactly deluged, but our readers have sent us a couple.The first of these, Edward A. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
The qualifications on IP of any of these people might be questioned. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
As we've discussed (and even polled you about), reasonable people can differ about who was to blame for the oath-of-office snafu. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:34 am
Loper says the judge wants to give the state and the defense in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
In 2002, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity" GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents has been… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 am
In 1981, the Court ruled in Edwards v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Edward Rusk, like many guys, didn’t think he just had to stop because a girl who seemed interested said she didn’t want to have sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:20 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
In part due to his current health problems, in part to his change of careers, and in part because the district court judge simply thought that was the case, saying: "I've been doing this long enough and I can tell, I think, when people are genuine . . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:40 am
Tags: AAJ, litigation lobby, politics Related posts Judean People’s Front v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
’” See Herrscher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
And it’s named after an inspiring figure: Raymond V. [read post]
