Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 1501 - 1520 of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Pacific Rivers Council v. U.S. Forest Service
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
Environmental - Appeals Court - http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.com/
Hungary Extradition Treaty with the United States
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
International Extradition Blog - http://www.internationalextraditionblog.com
[Eugene Volokh] Man meets 13-year-old boy for sex via Grindr, is prosecuted, sues Grindr for negligence
16 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
§ 230(e)(3). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part V: Judge Shedd and Judge Agee’s Dissents, and the Government’s Petitions for Certiorari and Applications for Stay
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Recent decisions by OATH Administrative Law Judges
11 Jul 2014, 7:46 am by The Public Employment Law Press
____________________The Discipline Book, - A concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State set out in a 2100+ page e-book. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, FTC v. Wilhelmsen, Civil Action No. 18-cv-00414-TSC
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 115 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing United States v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
E*Trade TILA Class Action Defense Cases-Silvas v. E*Trade: Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of UCL Class Action Premised On TILA Violations For Failure To Refund Loan Lock-In Fees Holding Federal Law Preempted Class Action Claims
19 Mar 2008, 5:22 am
E*Trade Mortgage Corp., 514 F.3d 1001, 1003 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
“John Doe,” Cyberstalking and Threatening a Public Official
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
’ The body of the e-mail stated:`did I just say that? [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Florida Social Media Censorship Law ENJOINED–NetChoice v. Moody
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
The State’s announced purpose of balancing the discussion—reining in the ideology of the large social-media providers—is precisely the kind of state action held unconstitutional in Tornillo, Hurley, and PG&E. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
 Ohio v. Clark: What Does It Mean for Child Protective Services?
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am by Sara DePasquale
G.S. 7B-323(b), (e). [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
TTAB Dismisses Opposition to "CREEL" for Legal Services: Acquired Distinctiveness Overcomes Section 2(e)(4) Surname Claim
31 May 2022, 3:26 am
Creel Abogados, S.C. and Carlos Creel Carrera v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
E.D.Pa.: Late Payment of Wages Constitutes Non-Payment of Wages, Subjecting Employer to Liquidated Damages Under FLSA
16 Oct 2014, 11:54 am by Andrew Frisch
Wilson, 1 F.3d 1537, 1542 (9th Cir.1993). [read post]
Overtime Law Blog - http://flsaovertimelaw.com/
Case o' The Week: Ninth Falls for Government's Snipe Hunt, New Fourth Rule
3 Feb 2008, 3:14 am
United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
Homeland wins appeal at CAFC against Whirlpool
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
S. 709, 718, n.7 (2005) (“[W]e are a court of review, not first view. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
CA2: Trailer inherently mobile for automobile exception, even with its "legs" out
9 Mar 2010, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Fractured decision in Arthrex. Judge Newman in dissent writes: This is a distortion of a carefully worded regulation, and changes its meaning. However, “a court is not free to disregard requirements simply because it considers them redundant or unsuited to achieving the general purpose in a particular case.” C.I.R. v. Gordon, 391 U.S. 83, 93 (1968).
24 Jan 2018, 10:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 404 (2000)(quoting United States v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
King – Obamacare subsidies as textualism’s big test
2 Mar 2015, 6:42 am by Abbe Gluck
Two examples from a list of many offered in the briefing:  Section 36B(f)(3) requires “[e]ach Exchange (or any person carrying out 1 or more responsibilities of an Exchange under section 1311(f)(3) or 1321(c)” to report the premiums doled out. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Fifth Circuit Again Stays FDA Denial of E-Cigarette Product Application
24 Mar 2023, 11:31 am by Jonathan H. Adler
City of Arlington, 668 F.3d at 242. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Amgen v. Coherus: Argument-based prosecution history estoppel
29 Jul 2019, 11:14 am by Jason Rantanen
Open E Cry, LLC, 728 F.3d 1309, 1322 (Fed. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Employee’s misuse of employer’s email results in dismissal
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
USDC, 135 F. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/