Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act does not apply to "actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:23 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
In FDA v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
It is pertinent to note that the United States contains only a “fair use” or fair dealing provision and not a separate “educational instruction” exception. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
The governor of Texas, perhaps taking inspiration from former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s drug war, orders state police to raid every Texan’s home to search for illegal drugs. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It's Cruel. http://t.co/NaXa78aNWa -> Gallagher v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
The district court denied his motion, and Latta now claims on appeal that the district court erred in denying the motion because, although he conceded that the initial stop was legal, he did not voluntarily consent to the trooper's second round of questions and the trooper did not have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying his detention until a drug dog arrived.Issues: Whether the trial court abused its discretion and commit reversible error when it denied… [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United StatesBarr v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
United States (Oct. 2) – How should courts interpret the federal sentencing law that allows a defendant convicted of some nonviolent drug crimes to avoid what would otherwise be a mandatory minimum sentence? [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Maryland and Giglio v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
