Search for: "Wells v. United States of America" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia  Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
I would be shocked if the highest echelons of the federal judiciary of the United States couldn't make it work in principle. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
But while westated that § 314 “may well preclude all review by anyroute,” we did not decide the issue. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
Third, the $2.88 quadrillion demand is not the biggest ever, and is well behind the $1.784 septillion demanded from Bank of America in 2009, but it's a lot. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm by Kenneth Vercammen NJ Law Blog
Guhl, Director Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES O.B., : : PETITIONER, : ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION : v [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Oklahoma) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the American Gas Association Amicus brief of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Amicus brief of the United States Supplemental petitioner’s brief in response to amicus brief of the United States Cases re-listed for this conference from the February 19, 2010 conference: Title: Dutka v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]