Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Legal blogging advocates [1] encourage lawyers that they can blog and they should blog and they will receive great benefit from blogging; similar advocacy-tinged advice touches on writing for other social-media platforms such as Twitter and LinkedIn. [2] Public legal writing is not new. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:14 am by Supreme People's Court Observer
 However, the law does not set out a definition, although some provincial court have issued guidance. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Gristey would have been twelve (12) months. [58] I think, however, that 12 months is too high when one factors in the economic considerations. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  (emphases added)   Because the policy was neither issued nor delivered in New York, the Court declined to apply    § 3429 (a) (5) in favor of the insured and instead upheld the insurer’s denial of coverage based upon a 58-day delay in giving notice. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:48 am by Sam Turco
The success rate of chapter 13 does not include those cases converted to chapter 7. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:51 am by Maine Employment Law Letter
The final vote was 58 percent against and 42 percent for the minimum wage hike. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Such a special duty can arise in three situations: (1) the plaintiff belonged to a class for whose benefit a statute was enacted; (2) the government entity voluntarily assumed a duty to the plaintiff beyond what was owed to the public generally; or (3) the municipality took positive control of a known and dangerous safety condition. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm by emagraken
It does not appear to deal with actions against employers or workers; they are covered by s-s (1). [read post]