Search for: "Individual Does 1-10"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 14,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 10:46 am
The award amount is required to be between 10 percent and 30 percent of the total monetary sanctions collected in the Commissionandrsquo;s action or any related action such as in a criminal case. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:33 pm
There is a couple of situations in which an individual does not have any choice but to file a Chapter 13. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:07 am
A cell line not so derived does not fall within the literal scope of claim 1. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
This statutes specifies that someone may receive this classification if: 1. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that; 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:36 pm
Radiation from the test can raise the risk of breast cancer, but it’s slight — the IARC estimated it to be between 1 and 10 cases of breast cancer for every 100,000 women screened. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:36 pm
”) IDEA Section 615(b)(1). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:24 am
An additional benefit is that such conveyancing does not involve the emotional strains of a buyer and seller. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that; 1. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
While the EEOC does aggregate and publish EEO-1 data it collect, it does not disclose EEO-1 data for a specific employer. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
The employee does not use the term “harassment. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
University of Texas at Austin (February 1, 2011) U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
In Part 1 of this article, we began examining the role of the Substance Abuse Evaluation in a License Appeal. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
[I]f you do not comply with the above request we intendto name you as a defendant to the lawsuit and proceedagainst you either individually in a severed suit if you request, or jointly ... we leave the election of how to proceed up to you, though we note costs and fees to sever and proceed against you individually in a separate suit are notable and we will demand that all such costs and fees be added to any settlement. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
However, this interpretation does not appear to be consistent with the purpose of the third sentence of Article 10(1). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:53 pm
On the face of it, the answer provided by the Court does not contain the nuance found in the answer proposed by Advocate General, who argued in favour of ex officio application ‘if, in the light of facts alleged by the parties which are not in dispute’ other two requirements from Article 10(1)(a) were met (nationality of the deceased and location of assets; see my previous post). [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 2:10 pm
Does it have Big Ideas(tm)? [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
In answering that question, I am not unmindful of the adage that “public policy is an unruly horse” or of the admonition that public policy “should be invoked only in clear cases, in which the harm to the public is substantially incontestable, and does not depend on the idiosyncratic inferences of a few judicial minds”: Re Millar, 1937 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1938] S.C.R. 1, [1938] 1 D.L.R. 65 [per Crocket J., quoting Lord Aitkin in… [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:41 am
§ 424.535(a)(10): “§ 424.535 – Revocation of enrollment in the Medicare program. (10) Failure to document or provide CMS access to documentation. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
Levin’s waiver argument was based on a specific provision of the Gonzalez Act, 10 U.S.C. [read post]
