Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
Since the venerable case of Ace Beer Distributors v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:08 am
Olympic Holding Company L.L.C. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:41 am
California and United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The appellant derived this “necessary implication” test from the context of human rights or the principle of legality referred to in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 and R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] UKHL 21, [2003] 1 AC 563, where the question was whether section 20 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 overrode legal professional privilege, a… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:06 pm
In Bourgeois v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Texas, and is a former chair of the ACS Board. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:29 am
Now Texas state Rep. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 9:56 am
In Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
Pinochet Ugarte (No. 1)[2000] 1 AC 61. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
See in particular the speech of Lord Porter in Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850 at 858. “ HELD The appeal was dismissed. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
In relation to the Secretary of State’s Article 101 TFEU damages claim, Servier reminded the court that even if it was found liable, the GC had held that the relevant market was wide enough to include other ACE inhibitors, and the Secretary of State should have encouraged its doctors to prescribe cheaper, generic ACE inhibitors alternatives to Perindopril when treating patients. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Shayler [2002] UKHL 11, [2003] 1 AC 247, at para. 113, citing with approval Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 6:07 am
In a 2002, United States 5th Circuit opinion, Lain v. [read post]
