Search for: "Berger v. People" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
Les catégories classiques du droit peuvent-elles héberger le neuf? [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
At the end of his decision, Judge Carney recalled a passage from Berger v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
The test is just the latest in the expanding arms race in South Asia, following India’s recent tests of its Agni-IV and Agni-V missiles, which are capable of traveling 2,500 and 3,400 miles respectively. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Berger reflects on the U.S.'s war of ideas against ISIS, concluding that “the most decisive defeat of [the Islamic States’] ideas will almost certainly coincide with its defeat on the battlefield. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
 Select 3 - To Be Is to Be Entangled 3 - To Be Is to Be Entangled pp 59-78 By Kirsten Anker  PDF  HTML Summary: This chapter engages with the contributions of Indigenous peoples in North America to a jurisprudence of entanglement, as expressed through historic treaties between colonists and Indigenous peoples. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
These requirements, according to the Chinese maritime safety authorities, apply to “1. submersibles; 2. nuclear vessels; 3. ships carrying radioactive materials; 4. ships carrying bulk oil, chemicals, liquefied gas and other toxic and harmful substances; [and] 5. other vessels that may endanger the maritime traffic safety of the [People’s Republic of] China. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
Miriam Berger reports for the Washington Post. [read post]