Search for: "Borden v. Case"
Results 141 - 160
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 12:18 pm
In Molina v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
’ The classic action of passing off is based on the trinity of (i) goodwill, (ii) misrepresentation to the public, and (iii) damage to the claimant, as was reaffirmed in the 'Jif Lemon' case (Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] UKHL 12). [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/plq3gzTcnD -> Costs order in Warman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 3:55 pm
Borden v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Court grants Anton Pillar order in CanLII – 2014 ONSC 323 http://t.co/j2wV55usGx -> Court finds social media evidence admissible in Ducharme v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
The Manitoba Court of Appeal recently held, in Ducharme v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
Cases like Berman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
Waring v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Sorochan said a social covenant was made to military personnel during the First World War by Prime Minister Robert Borden in 1917. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
The judgment, which this Kat has only just received and hasn't yet time to read in full, appears to bring British passing off law up to date, running through the classical Jif Lemon case of Reckitt & Colman v Borden, through the 1970s consolidation of the law in Tavener Rutledge v Trexapalm (the Kojak Lollipops case) [1977] RPC 275, Lyngstad v Anabas (goods carrying photographs of the pop group Abba) [1977] FSR 62, and Wombles v… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
Tokai Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
According to Markus D Dubber in his article “Criminal Law between Public and Private Law,” the formal publicness of criminal law is reflected in the title of criminal cases.[7] To Dubber, this is proof of the procedural and institutional framework for criminal law’s resolution: based on a state official’s investigation (the police officer), the case is brought by a public lawyer (the prosecutor) before yet another (the judge) who—… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
According to Markus D Dubber in his article “Criminal Law between Public and Private Law,” the formal publicness of criminal law is reflected in the title of criminal cases.[7] To Dubber, this is proof of the procedural and institutional framework for criminal law’s resolution: based on a state official’s investigation (the police officer), the case is brought by a public lawyer (the prosecutor) before yet another (the judge) who—… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:42 am
The Impact of Canning v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 3:30 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:14 am
Oral arguments are scheduled today in National Association of Manufacturers et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
The case is McCambridge Limited v Joseph Brennan Bakeries [2012] IESC 46, for which there is a majority decision (here) and a dissenting judgment (here). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
" The "Jif" lemon from Reckitt and Coleman v Borden The Supreme Court had to decide if the judge had erred on a point of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
" The "Jif" lemon from Reckitt and Coleman v Borden The Supreme Court had to decide if the judge had erred on a point of law. [read post]
