Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 141 - 160
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Here, the Reviewing Board ruled that 50% does, in fact, satisfy the “a major” requirement of § 1(7A). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Here, the Reviewing Board ruled that 50% does, in fact, satisfy the “a major” requirement of § 1(7A). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Here, the Reviewing Board ruled that 50% does, in fact, satisfy the “a major” requirement of § 1(7A). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 3:03 pm
Here, the Reviewing Board ruled that 50% does, in fact, satisfy the “a major” requirement of § 1(7A). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures) back in 2005): “ . . . the IRE becomes an item of evidence just as would the results of any medical examination the claimant submitted to at the request of his employer. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Sound View Innovations, LLC, IPR2018-01039, Paper 29 (PTAB Dec. 20, 2019) (precedential), does not apply to examination. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
Wood v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:33 pm
Defense firm litigation tactics that that are excessive, and counter to the legislative intent of the Workers’ Compensation Act, should be discouraged.Tordaro v Gloucester County Department of Corrections, A-0204-14T2, 215 WL 995827, (N.J. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:07 am
Although second medical use protection has had limited importance in the treatment of COVID-19, it has put in the spotlight the overall need for quick reactions to new diseases, which is one of the many factors justifying such protection, according to Jochen Bühling, partner of the German law firm of Krieger Mes & Graf v. der Groeben and editor of ‘Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses’. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
This appeal does not involve a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 11:12 am
Facts: This case (Chesnut et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
This concept was again tested by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Leca v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:09 am
In December, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
However, the RPBA seems to only impose constraints on late-file submissions by parties, as does Art. 114(2) EPC, and not by third parties. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
If the collective bargaining agreement does not set out procedures for conducting GML §207-c hearings, the employer is free to establish such a procedureNassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. v Nassau County, 2016 NY Slip Op 02096, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Nassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
” Today we’re examining another Louisiana legal peculiarity. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Graffiti on the bathroom wall in the building that housed my undergraduate college’s philosophy department: How does a philosopher treat constipation? [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:29 pm
Here, the claims focus on an improvement to medical imaging and require operations on image contents based on tracking modalities. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:29 pm
Here, the claims focus on an improvement to medical imaging and require operations on image contents based on tracking modalities. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
