Search for: "Does 1-42"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm
And how does it work in California? [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:22 am
According to 42 C.F.R. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:22 am
According to 42 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
See 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
" 42 U.S.C. s 11607(b)(3). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
For example, the Irish decision states “It is not contested that Section 42 [the provision in question relating to compulsory licences] does permit discrimination as to the field of technology in respect of enjoyment of patent rights contrary to Article 27(1) of TRIPS”. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:00 am
This duty, however, does not arise where the civil action or proceeding is brought by or on behalf of the State.The State’s duty to defend or indemnify and save harmless the individual is subject to the following conditions:: 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
[1] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887; id. at 886 (“nor is it possible to limit the impact of respondents’ proposal by requiring a ‘compelling state interest’ only when the conduct prohibited is ‘central’ to the individual’s religion”).[2] 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm
IN-HOUSE SURVEY RESULTS: Examination Quality is "Excellent" or Very Good" EPO - 70% USPTO - 56% JPO - 54% KIPO (Korea) - 25% SIPO (China) - 18% Overall, Patent Quality Has Improved/Stayed the Same/Gotten Worse EPO: improved = 26%, stayed the same = 71%, got worse = 3% USPTO: improved = 23%, stayed the same = 61%, got worse = 16% JPO: improved = 17%, stayed the same = 78%, got worse = 5% KIPO: improved = 34%, stayed the same = 61%, got worse = 5% SIPO: improved = 58%, stayed the same =… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:31 am
What does this mean to my WC injury and claim? [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:31 am
What does this mean to my WC injury and claim? [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:31 am
What does this mean to my WC injury and claim? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” CAADCA § 31(a)(1)(B) (emphasis added). [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
First things first: from where does the federal government get this authority? [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
I, § 107(a), 105 Stat. 1075 (codified at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:56 am
So, this, hardly convincing, argument does not hold. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:58 pm
CA Code of Regulations Div. 42, Ch. 1, Sec. 5044 states that minimum camera resolution must be 1280 x 720 pixels. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:41 am
Aug. 1, 2007), cert granted, is available here. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, an individual who spent exactly 124 days in the US this year and the previous two years would have a total of 187 days under the substantial presence test: This Year: 124 x 1= 124 Last Year: 124 x 1/3= 42 2 Yrs Ago: 124 x 1/6= 21 Total= 187 days. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, an individual who spent exactly 124 days in the US this year and the previous two years would have a total of 187 days under the substantial presence test: This Year: 124 x 1= 124 Last Year: 124 x 1/3= 42 2 Yrs Ago: 124 x 1/6= 21 Total= 187 days. [read post]
