Search for: "English v. Jacobs"
Results 141 - 160
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
Old English practices that ended long before American independence are of little relevance. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
For more information of the historical origins of section 60(2), see a beast of a judgment from Jacob LJ in Grimme Landmaschinefabrik BmbH v Scott [2010] EWCA Civ 1110. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:58 am
" In plain English, this means that an activity is not covered by the ADA solely because it is licensed by a public entity. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
Lyle Denniston covered the denials for this blog, while I covered them in Plain English. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Lucia) Limited et al v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Lucia) Limited et al v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
But the Supreme Court itself in the Plyler v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Personality/merchandising rights: German law is much closer to US law than English law. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
Team Jacob debate that emerged from the Twilight saga. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Jacobs, 363 N.C. 815, 822, 689 S.E.2d 859, 864 (2010). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Ladd v Marshall [1954 EWCA Civ 1; MMI Research v Cellxion [2012] EWCA Civ 7).Brian also reminded the audience of the three categories of amendments recognised by Jacob LJ in Nikken v Pioneer [2005] EWCA Civ 906:(a) before a trial; (b) after trial, at which certain claims have been held valid but other claims held invalid, the patentee simply wishing to delete the invalid claims (I would include here also the case where the patentee wishes to re-write the claims so… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
”Matthews v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decisionWeekly Roundups: Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
