Search for: "FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION" Results 141 - 160 of 5,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 9:41 am by Mike Scarcella
” Two suits against Exxon in Washington federal district court merged into the single appellate case. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am by INFORRM
Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to contribute to the development of an integrated and progressive jurisprudence and understanding on freedom of expression and information around the world. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:15 am
Federal Election Commission that under the First Amendment, the government could not restrict a corporation’s independent political spending, even in the interest of aligning corporate expression with shareholders’ views. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:23 am by admin
The high court is slated to hear arguments on October 8th in the case of Altitude Express v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Katherine Gasztonyi
Fran Rosch, Senior Vice President of Security Products and Services, Endpoint and Mobility at Symantec Corporation, and Chairwoman Ramirez of the FTC warned against a standard that required the adoption of certain technologies. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   STANDARD OF REVIEW ON APPEAL    Both the existence of an express contract and federal preemption are affirmative defenses to [party's] state law quantum meruit claim. [read post]
Once seen only in the shadows of the war against organized crime, the Federal Wiretap Act should now be moving steadily and rapidly toward the top of the corporate compliance checklist. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
  Well, under federal diversity jurisprudence, it is a resident of the state where its corporate nerve center is located and the state where it is incorporated. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
In an interesting case in the USDC for the Middle District of Tennessee, a magistrate judge denied a corporate plaintiff’s request for an in camera review of putatively privileged documents, finding that an automatic review “would open the floodgates and allow any party to demand an in camera review” if it “expressed an unfounded suspicion” that counsel for the opposing party “misrepresented the basis of the privilege claim. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
In an interesting case in the USDC for the Middle District of Tennessee, a magistrate judge denied a corporate plaintiff’s request for an in camera review of putatively privileged documents, finding that an automatic review “would open the floodgates and allow any party to demand an in camera review” if it “expressed an unfounded suspicion” that counsel for the opposing party “misrepresented the basis of the privilege claim. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
In an interesting case in the USDC for the Middle District of Tennessee, a magistrate judge denied a corporate plaintiff’s request for an in camera review of putatively privileged documents, finding that an automatic review “would open the floodgates and allow any party to demand an in camera review” if it “expressed an unfounded suspicion” that counsel for the opposing party “misrepresented the basis of the privilege claim. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
In an interesting case in the USDC for the Middle District of Tennessee, a magistrate judge denied a corporate plaintiff’s request for an in camera review of putatively privileged documents, finding that an automatic review “would open the floodgates and allow any party to demand an in camera review” if it “expressed an unfounded suspicion” that counsel for the opposing party “misrepresented the basis of the privilege claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern Division in this personal-injury case against Federal Express, reversed and remanded the the trial court's entry of judgement in favor of the defendant. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:26 pm by Sean Hayes
The Federation of Korean Industries, a chaebol pressure group, has urged prosecutors to go easy on Mr Chey. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
In a recent discussion of a major copyright infringement case with an attorney colleague, he expressed surprise that a corporate officer had been held personally liable for a copyright infringement that had been committed by a corporation.Most of us in law school learn that the corporate shield will protect corporate officers from liability for most actions of officers, with possible exceptions such as liability for unpaid payroll, gross negligence or criminal… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:51 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Senate contained an express Congressional finding that a “central cause” of the economic crisis was a “widespread failure of corporate governance. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Federal Election Commission, granting corporations the right to spend directly on express political advocacy, has become the target of particularly heated critique. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:34 pm by Stanley Radtke
The demand for prison labor by corporations such as IBM, AT&T and 3M creates a greater incentive to incarcerate. [read post]