Search for: "Feltes v. People" Results 141 - 160 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Daniel Schwartz
The full impact of the decision will be felt for an entire generation while a full analysis of the decision’s impact will take some more time too. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:32 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
  This is just the label that Congress felt bankruptcy attorneys needed to have applied to them. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Sanford, which held that Black people had no rights white men were bound to respect, or Plessy v. [read post]