Search for: "Feltes v. People" Results 141 - 160 of 3,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Suzanne Goldberg
In that moment, it was hard to be confident that the Justices would strike down Colorado’s ban on antidiscrimination protections for gay people, given Bowers v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:32 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
”[4] The judge found that Chinese courts were distinct from the legislative and administrative bodies of the state, and that although there was evidence to suggest that Chinese judges sometimes felt the need to meet the expectations of the local people’s congress or branch of the Communist Party, this did not justify refusing to recognize the court system as a whole. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
  This is just the label that Congress felt bankruptcy attorneys needed to have applied to them. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Daniel Schwartz
The full impact of the decision will be felt for an entire generation while a full analysis of the decision’s impact will take some more time too. [read post]