Search for: "Fraser v. Fraser"
Results 141 - 160
of 555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Further, and following on from the decision in Jack Wills Ltd v House of Fraser Stores Ltd [2016] EWHC 626, the Court refused to make any deduction to JGC's profits in relation cases where the infringement did not 'drive' the sale - there was no evidence to sustain a finding that sales had been driven by factors other than infringement. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
Fraser (1986), Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Hamilton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:45 am
Here is the symposium from the McGill Law Journal: Indigenous Law and Legal Pluralism ARTICLES 0 Introduction: Moving from the Why to the How of Indigenous Law Fraser Harland 721 0 An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland 725 0 WSÁNEĆ Legal Theory and the Fuel Spill at SELEKTEL (Goldstream River) Robert YELḰÁTTE Clifford 755 0 Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am
Mr Justice Fraser stated that separate legal personality of the constituent entities of corporate group represents a fundamental principle of English law (at [92]) and claimants failed to provide evidence of high degree of control and direction by RDS sufficient to meet the three-fold test on the existence of duty of care set by Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and clarified by Chandler v Cape. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:55 am
Another argument, cited by the Conservative thinktank the Fraser Institute is that the "40/30" formula was developed to measure childcare costs at the poverty line, and that as incomes increase above and beyond $150,000, the Guidelines tend to overestimate the cost of child support.Let's say one or both of these arguments was true. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:11 pm
See Threadgill v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
Here, it is undisputed that the petitioners never moved in this Court pursuant to CPLR 5518 for a preliminary injunction pending appeal (see Matter of Yeshiva Gedolah Academy of Beth Aaron Synogogue v City of Long Beach, 118 AD3d 901, 902; Matter of Molloy v Fraser, 74 AD3d 1207, 1208). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
” Justice Burns likened the present case to French v Fraser, in which Justice Lucy McCallum referred to the plaintiff as “the target of a senseless vendetta founded in madness”. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:24 pm
In British Columbia Teachers’ Federation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
Fraser Health Authority. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
West Fraser Real Estate Holdings Ltd., 2007 BCSC 990, Mr. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:20 am
Discontent also flared when the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nat Fraser against his conviction for murder (Fraser v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 24) on the grounds that it disagreed with the High Court of Justiciary on the consequences of the admitted non-disclosure in that case. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Please click here for more information.Other decisions addressing an employee’s alleged misuse of an employer’s electronic equipment include: Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:58 am
Unlike past Canadian lumber CVD determinations where CVD margins never exceeded 20%, the DOC could very well calculate a much higher than expected CVD rate in Lumber V. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
Other decisions involving an employer’s use of electronic equipment underlying disciplinary action being taken against the employee include: Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
Brian Cathcart filleted Fraser Nelson’s self-congratulatory piece about the story in the Telegraph. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 4:53 pm
Pull the other one – Brian Cathcart 10 ways in which the Telegraph’s Fraser Nelson gets it wrong about Allardyce, Leveson and the Press – Brian Cathcart Keith Vaz, the Sunday Mirror and the Public Interest: must politicians live by different standards? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Weisberg, David Fraser and Vivian Grosswald Curran. 28 Law & Literature 1-95 (2016). [read post]
