Search for: "General Ship Corp. v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
Solicitor General. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
FMC Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Unit B 1981). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437, 441 (2007) (“It is the general rule under United States patent law that no infringementoccurs when a patented product is made and sold inanother country. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:49 pm
United States, 336 U.S. 511, 516, 69 S. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
And the United States Navy was ahead of Selikoff in terms of detailing the difficulty in controlling confined-space asbestos lagging operations onboard ships, and the consequent asbestosis hazards[5]. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm
The Celotex Corp., Phila. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:44 am
” Pointing to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v Stanley, the appellate panel explained that no Bivens remedy is available for injuries that “arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
In Zeidenberg, many retailers would not accept returns of opened CDs, and there could have been unreimbursed shipping charges in Hill v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Wong and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated and shipped the case back to California for reconsideration in light of Concepcion. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
(Think about how knowledgeable the United States Navy was about the hazards of asbestos insulation products it bought for ship building.) [read post]
