Search for: "Grant v. Martin et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Strickland, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de Havilland… [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
" Michelle & Edward Rau, et al v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Baker III et al., Football v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:26 am
In Sun Capital Partners III, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
AWARD, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Apple Retail UK Limited, et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Apple Retail UK Limited, et al. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
In my discretion, I have accepted this recording into the record.Turning to the merits, a board of education has broad authority to prescribe the course of study in the schools of the district (Education Law § 1709 [3]; Appeal of McLoughlin and Carusi, 44 Ed Dept Rep 336, Decision No. 15,191; Appeal of Murphy, et al., 39 id. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
In my discretion, I have accepted this recording into the record.Turning to the merits, a board of education has broad authority to prescribe the course of study in the schools of the district (Education Law § 1709 [3]; Appeal of McLoughlin and Carusi, 44 Ed Dept Rep 336, Decision No. 15,191; Appeal of Murphy, et al., 39 id. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:55 am
Shi V. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Berel Caesar, (Nov. 2, 1988) (granting compulsory nonsuit on the plaintiff’s claim that his colorectal cancer was caused by his occupational exposure to asbestos) Grassis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Now, Kat Neil analyses the recent report by Nobel laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz et al in which the alternatives to the patent system are explored: Alternative ways for financing and incentivizing research: a Nobel laureate and his colleagues state their case. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Van Nes, 2016 BCSC 686 Kent v Martin, 2016 ABQB 314 Pritchard v. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 9:21 pm
On 1 June 2006 the Trial Chamber in the Milutinovic et al. case also granted the joint request by the six Accused for temporary release from 15 July to 4 August 2006. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
