Search for: "Harrison v. Back"
Results 141 - 160
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
(Hodgins v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
The Epic Games v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
Harrison v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
KG v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:34 am
East Bay Drywall, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:54 am
Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
There was very little press coverage and incomplete information on the Harrison, Pensa website. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
NOT THE LAST WORD ON THE MATTER Because the appeal resulted in the reversal of a summary judgment in favor of the lawfirm defendants, the case will go back to the trial court for further litigation in light of the appellate court's resolution of the legal issues raised at the summary judgment stage. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
George Harrison, for example, was found to have infringed the copyright in the song “He’s So Fine” when he wrote “My Sweet Lord,” even though the court acknowledged that it was probably a case of unconscious borrowing (see Bright Tunes Music v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
By chance today I read an interesting article in the current edition of the Society for Computers & Law journal on Bilski v Kappos by Dr Robert Harrison and Jordan S Hatcher, in which they suggest that companies build defensive IP portfolios to use when faced with a challenge of patent infringement from a competitor -- to cross-license or cross-sue. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Harrison. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 3:45 am
Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
[Jackson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Back to the Iowa fraud act. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am
That is why we will take our time and come back with a considered view. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:42 am
Moreover, in Harrison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
In the case of Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited ([2015] NSWSC 171) McCallum J refused the plaintiff leave to “plead back” (amend the pleadings to rely on) the defendant’s “contextual imputations”. [read post]
