Search for: "Hollingsworth " Results 141 - 160 of 615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2014, 3:05 am by Paul Caron
Kennedy (John Marshall), DOMA Implications for Employee Benefit Plans: Round 2, 144 Tax Notes 947 (Aug. 25, 2014): This report updates Kennedy’s earlier Tax Notes article on employee benefits guidance issued by the IRS and the Department of Labor soon after the Supreme Court’s 2013 decisions in Hollingsworth... [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That, in fact, had been the actual decision the Court had issued on the same day that it issued the Windsor decision:  Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am by Steve Vladeck
Usually, the case-or-controversy requirement shows up in appellate review by requiring that the appellant have Article III standing to appeal–the very defect that proved fatal to the Prop. 8 proponents in the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:16 am
The sequel to Windsor and the Prop 8 case (by the way, that’s Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
  Some day, Hollingsworth or one of the luminaries on that defense team will be able to author an entire hornbook on all of the issues that have cropped up in that litigation. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm by Lowell Brown
Windsor, striking down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that refused to recognize same-sex marriages, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Lowell Brown
Most viewers will probably know how the case ends, but the filmmakers still manage to build tension as the story moves through the courts toward its resolution, the June 2013 Supreme Court decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am by Marty Lederman
  In still other cases, as I explained in a SCOTUSblog post last year, the executive might enforce and not defend at the outset, but then decline to appeal a lower-court ruling that the statute is unconstitutional and cease enforcement – which is what the governor and attorney general of California did in the Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
If so, that would put further pressure on the Supreme Court to address the issue that it ducked when it dismissed Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
For example, last Term the Hollingsworth case (the federal injunction against California's Prop. 8) was carried over for four conferences before the Court granted review. [read post]