Search for: "In Re Welfare of Miles"
Results 141 - 160
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
It has been ordered to be re-tried before a three judge court. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:33 am
This avoids having to “re-alternate” weekends thereafter. [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 7:43 pm
At least in the beginning, they trust that unskilled and often menial employment in the West—under the aegis of a far more liberal welfare state and the rule of law—are better than anything back home. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:13 pm
Because Panetta couldn't figure how bin Laden lived more than five years, undetected, about a mile from Pakistan's military academy, akin to our West Point. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
It’s not that you don’t pay, it’s that if you’re a little guy or gal, you shouldn’t pay a lot more than the bigshots. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
I can almost understand where they're coming from in Michigan, if the state really has to interfere in private citizens' lives at least do it properly. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
" In re U.S. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
So, they’re difficult to adjust properly. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Law & Climate Change Law Newsletter October 18, 2010, Volume 2, Number 31 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Law & Climate Change Law Newsletter October 18, 2010, Volume 2, Number 31 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Law & Climate Change Law Newsletter October 18, 2010, Volume 2, Number 31 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
But they’re still delegations. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
September 29, 2015) — DC Circuit issued a unanimous ruling affirming the rejection of a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club in which they argued that the federal government was obliged to conduct a NEPA analysis of the entirety of an 580 mile oil pipeline constructed by Enbridge Pipelines (FSP), LLC, holding that the federal government as not required to conduct a NEPA analysis of the entirety of the pipeline project. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:06 pm
A person who violates the prohibition against knowingly and intentionally releasing, or causing to be released, a balloon into the atmosphere must watch a re-educational video and/or perform community service. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
Compliance with a variety of Federally-"mandated" educational programs at all levels of public education are incentivized this way, and so are certain welfare programs like AFDC, Medicare, and TANF. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
— ABC 7, March 17, 2010 New Mexico is pushing ahead with a plan to give hundreds of miles of rivers and streams and thousands of acres of wetlands special protection under the federal Clean Water Act despite concerns from farmers and ranchers. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
30 May 2009, 7:00 am
He lauded the former President's accomplishments in office, citing job creation stimulated by cuts in welfare payments to America's poor and Mr. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:27 pm
The Labor Commission may recover up to a $10,000 penalty for each instance an employer re-verifies the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by federal law. [read post]
