Search for: "In re Rules of Civ. P." Results 141 - 160 of 752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm by MOTP
  More than a decade down the road, a bankruptcy court has now ruled that TERI "funded" the program under which the loans were originated. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Livewest Homes Ltd v Bamber (2019) EWCA Civ 1174 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of a second appeal on the issue of when six months notice of intention to terminate a tenancy must be given under section 21(1B). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
[iv] In ENRC, the appellate court reversed a lower court’s ruling that had significantly narrowed the attorney-client privilege in internal investigations. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
Citibank, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which also sits in Houston and lords over the same trial courts in ten surrounding counties, did not merely hold that use of credit card and payments to account demonstrated existence of contract (thus ruling against the Defendant on that issue), but also reversed the judgment in part because the bank had not adduced any evidence of what the variable interest rate was at the relevant time (thereby sustaining one of the Defendant’s complaints… [read post]