Search for: "JOHN DOE v. HILL" Results 141 - 160 of 666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Capitol Hill Negotiations on a second large COVID-19 relief legislation effectively broke down August 7. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Rubinfeld (NYU), on Friday, July 3, 2020 Tags: Asset management, Common ownership, Firm performance, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Ownership An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
PHOTOS: President Trump's Mount Rushmore speech"We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776 [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
This does not mean, however, that indirect purchaser class actions can or should never be certified. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Norman Doe, Dick Helmholz, Mark Hill, John Witte, Jr. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:49 pm by Andrew Hursh
” Chief Justice John Roberts sat to hear the arguments in the morning before heading to Capitol Hill for his other ongoing duties presiding over the impeachment trial of President Trump. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Only after making those factual determinations does the judge or jury apply those facts to the allegations and the correct legal standard to determine whether the allegations are sufficiently supported. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The committee will hear testimony from John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Perhaps the most famous line written by the Supreme Court is John Marshall’s statement that it is “emphatically the province and the duty of the judicial department to say what the law is”—and without any guidance from the courts, the executive branch has developed more and more aggressive formulations of its authority. [read post]